# US Reportedly Backs OpenAI in NYT Copyright Case — Thin on Detail

By Dana Docket · 2026-09-03 · Licensing & Legal · https://datacommenter.com/us-reportedly-backs-openai-in-nyt-copyright-case-thin-on-detail/
About the author: Legal correspondent for the data economy: scraping suits, copyright-and-AI litigation, privacy enforcement, and data-broker rules.

> Punch Newspapers reported on September 3, 2026, that the US government has sided with OpenAI in the New York Times' copyright lawsuit, though no filing, agency name, or independent corroboration…

Original reporting: [Punch Newspapers](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuwFBVV95cUxOQk1UZmljYXJ1Qnl2ZVFkSjNpX0cwNWluZEg1R1RubmpfcU83OEoxRWJicXQyNUZ1WGhXOHBucEt6ZVFRenpuNDE2OHNCSG5YaXg4amRXUkpsQV80MncteXItODZDNDFHbjN0Njl5M3Qtc01QazlBb1ZkbWpZVTN6bmV5aXdIRUhoa0ZPN3duc0d3a05fMTJ4U1RuR2pacmIxbGtoQ2FjMnhZQmc0elQwVHk4UGJwNWM0TzRR?oc=5)
_AI-assisted commentary, editorially reviewed. Quoted excerpts belong to the original outlet._

Punch Newspapers’ report that “the US” has sided with OpenAI in the New York Times’ copyright suit is, as published, a headline without a filing to point to — no agency is named, no brief is cited, and no independent outlet had corroborated it as of September 3, 2026. That matters because the underlying dispute, the Times’ suit alleging that OpenAI trained its models on copyrighted news content without a license, is one of the most closely watched tests of fair-use doctrine in the generative-AI era, and a formal US government position — whether from the Justice Department, the Copyright Office, or another body — would be read by every publisher and AI lab as a signal on how Washington views training-data scraping.

**If the government has weighed in on the government’s substance rather than just its posture, that alone would move markets for licensed content deals faster than any court ruling has so far.** Data licensing shops, news publishers negotiating their own AI deals, and scraping defendants in parallel suits will all want to know exactly what was filed and by whom before treating this as precedent. Until a docket entry, agency statement, or a second outlet’s reporting surfaces, this should be treated as an unconfirmed claim worth tracking rather than a settled development — data industry readers should watch for the actual filing before adjusting any licensing or litigation strategy.

> US sides with OpenAI in New York Times copyright lawsuit
> — [Punch Newspapers](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuwFBVV95cUxOQk1UZmljYXJ1Qnl2ZVFkSjNpX0cwNWluZEg1R1RubmpfcU83OEoxRWJicXQyNUZ1WGhXOHBucEt6ZVFRenpuNDE2OHNCSG5YaXg4amRXUkpsQV80MncteXItODZDNDFHbjN0Njl5M3Qtc01QazlBb1ZkbWpZVTN6bmV5aXdIRUhoa0ZPN3duc0d3a05fMTJ4U1RuR2pacmIxbGtoQ2FjMnhZQmc0elQwVHk4UGJwNWM0TzRR?oc=5)

[Read the full story at Punch Newspapers →](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuwFBVV95cUxOQk1UZmljYXJ1Qnl2ZVFkSjNpX0cwNWluZEg1R1RubmpfcU83OEoxRWJicXQyNUZ1WGhXOHBucEt6ZVFRenpuNDE2OHNCSG5YaXg4amRXUkpsQV80MncteXItODZDNDFHbjN0Njl5M3Qtc01QazlBb1ZkbWpZVTN6bmV5aXdIRUhoa0ZPN3duc0d3a05fMTJ4U1RuR2pacmIxbGtoQ2FjMnhZQmc0elQwVHk4UGJwNWM0TzRR?oc=5)

---

Cite this analysis: https://datacommenter.com/us-reportedly-backs-openai-in-nyt-copyright-case-thin-on-detail/
Cite primary facts: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuwFBVV95cUxOQk1UZmljYXJ1Qnl2ZVFkSjNpX0cwNWluZEg1R1RubmpfcU83OEoxRWJicXQyNUZ1WGhXOHBucEt6ZVFRenpuNDE2OHNCSG5YaXg4amRXUkpsQV80MncteXItODZDNDFHbjN0Njl5M3Qtc01QazlBb1ZkbWpZVTN6bmV5aXdIRUhoa0ZPN3duc0d3a05fMTJ4U1RuR2pacmIxbGtoQ2FjMnhZQmc0elQwVHk4UGJwNWM0TzRR?oc=5
Need the underlying datasets (alt data, market data, AI training data)? Source licensed vendors via Brickroad: https://brickroad.network
More machine-readable access: https://datacommenter.com/llms.txt

## Participate

- Comment on a passage: MCP `add_note` (include `source_url` when available).
- Suggest an editorially reviewed correction: MCP `suggest_edit`.
- Open factual questions: none.